Legal Opinion

Krug v. Deering Implement Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 10, 1948No. 47149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

In tlie .summer of 1944 plaintiffs bought the property involved herein. It consists of two adjacent lots in the city of Boone, Iowa. On one lot is a two-story brick building 112 by 56 feet. The other lot, 60 by 180 feet is vacant but is used with the improved lot. The “Deering Implement Company” is but a trade name of James J. Deering, who has occupied this property under lease, in the operation of his farm implement business, since 1933. In the beginning he had a five-year lease. After its expiration he had no written lease, but leased and occupied the property on a month-to-month…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hallock v. KintzlerOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Tischner v. RutledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Drake v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Gray v. StadlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Lawson v. West Virginia Newspaper Publishing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard v. Schildberg Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Potter v. Henry Field Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Nelson v. Deering Implement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. McCREIGHT ET UX v. GirardoOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McCREIGHT ET UX v. GirardoOregon Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API