Legal Opinion

McCREIGHT ET UX v. Girardo

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1955Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

*229Edwin- J. Welsh, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

On Rehearing

*230Richard F. Deich, Portland, argned the cause for respondent. On the brief were Bryson and Deich, Portland. Before Warner, Chief Justice, and Tooze, Boss-man, Lusk, Latourette and Perry, Justices. PERRY, J.

We granted a rehearing in this case, and, after more mature consideration of the question involved, have reached the conclusion that our former opinion was in error.

The plaintiffs commenced this suit against the defendant in Multnomah county for the purpose of having their rights determined…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Taylor v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Diffenderfer v. Board of President of St. Louis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Powell v. Dayton, Sheridan & Grand Ronde R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Suburban Imp. Co. v. Scott Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API