Legal Opinion

Van Curen v. Village of Mayfield

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1974No. 32566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMonagle, J.

The complaint filed in the Court of Common Pleas was one for a declaratory judgment. The prayer of the complaint reads as follows:

I. That the zoning ordinance, zoning plaintiff’s 90 x 47 foot parcel of land for single-family use (U-l), is unconstitutional, invalid and void to the extent it pertains to the use of plaintiff’s 90 x 47 foot parcel, and that it is not binding on plaintiff;

II. That the defendant, Village of Mayfield, be permanently enjoined and restrained from enforcing and executing the zoning ordinance zoning plaintiff’s 90 x 47 foot parcel as it applies to plaintiff;

III. That…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. West LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Radaszewski v. KeatingOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Burt Realty Corp. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gates Mills Investment Co. v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API