Van Curen v. Village of Mayfield
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMcMonagle, J.
The complaint filed in the Court of Common Pleas was one for a declaratory judgment. The prayer of the complaint reads as follows:
I. That the zoning ordinance, zoning plaintiff’s 90 x 47 foot parcel of land for single-family use (U-l), is unconstitutional, invalid and void to the extent it pertains to the use of plaintiff’s 90 x 47 foot parcel, and that it is not binding on plaintiff;
II. That the defendant, Village of Mayfield, be permanently enjoined and restrained from enforcing and executing the zoning ordinance zoning plaintiff’s 90 x 47 foot parcel as it applies to plaintiff;
III. That…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- State, Ex Rel. v. West LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Radaszewski v. KeatingOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Burt Realty Corp. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gates Mills Investment Co. v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982