Legal Opinion
International Business Machines Corp. v. Sperry Rand Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 7, 1968No. Misc. No. 40PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAYTON, District Judge.
The parties now before the Court are the litigants before the Board of Patent Interferences in Interference No. 93,544. Pursuant to Title 35 U.S.C. § 24, and Rules 34 and 37 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, International Business Machines (IBM) has filed motions for the production of certain documents held by Sperry Rand Corporation (Sperry) and for sanctions against Sperry should it fail to comply with the order of the Court. The documents involved here were the subject of a similar motion presented to this Court in October, 1967, at which time…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- United States v. Walter F. Tellier, Albert Joseph Proctor, Elton B. Jones and Alaska Telephone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- The B. F. Goodrich Tire Company v. E. H. LysterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- American Cyanamid Company v. Hercules Powder CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.