Legal Opinion

City of Franklin v. Gerovac

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1972No. 208PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The proceedings herein were extensive and apparently covered several days of trial. However, only a partial transcript was filed, and only a portion of the testimony is before us in this case.

It is undisputed that Gerovac purchased the property in question in 1950. At that time, the city of Franklin had not been organized, the area was rural in nature, and no zoning ordinance prohibited Gerovac’s use of the property as a salvage yard. It is undisputed on this appeal that, from 1950 until the present time, Gerovae continually operated his business at its present location.

In 1956 the town of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Village of Whitefish BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Schroedel v. PagelsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. David A. Ulrich, Inc. v. Town of SaukvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Town of Wilson v. KunstmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guy v. Town of TempleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. Maricopa County v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. Dembo, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Opinion No. Oag 19-77, (1977), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1977
  5. Town of Little Wolf v. Waupaca Cnty.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API