Pred v. Employers Indemnity Corp.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
In an action on a policy for collision insurance, plaintiff recovered a judgment for damages to his automobile, occasioned by coming in contact with an embankment at the side of a highway on which the car was being operated. Defendant appeals.
Two questions are presented for determination, both of which are dependent upon the interpretation to be placed upon the terms of the policy. Defendant denies liability on these grounds: (1) Because the collision occurred while the automobile was being operated by one who had no authority to operate it. (2) The fact that the automobile left the highway…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Universal Service Co. v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Interstate Casualty Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Dixon v. Western Union Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Bruener v. Twin City Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Bolduc v. New York Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Ringo v. Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Commonwealth v. BleakneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.