Legal Opinion

Tillitson v. City of Urbana

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1963No. 37774PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

Defendant, the city of Urbana, appeals from a decree of the circuit court of Champaign County which found the city’s zoning ordinance invalid insofar as it restricted to residential use certain real estate owned by the plaintiffs, Swayne Tillitson, Marilyn C. McLintock, Phyllis Fritchey, Joseph A. Yeazel, and Edith B. Yeazel, and which enjoined the municipality from interfering with the erection of a gasoline filling station upon the premises. The trial judge has certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance is involved and that public interest requires a direct appeal to this court.

•…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Krom v. City of ElmhurstIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Exchange National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Northern Trust Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Mundelein Estates, Inc. v. Village of MundeleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Tews v. WoolhiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Duggan v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. County of McHenryIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. County of Cook v. PriesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. The PEOPLE v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Aurora National Bank v. City of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API