Legal Opinion
Royal v. Potter
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided February 21, 2006No. CIV.A.2:04 1114PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHAMBERS, District Judge.
On October 15, 2004, Ruth Royal filed this action alleging sex based discrimination in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. She alleges a claim of sex discrimination and failure to promote in violation of Title VII, a retaliation claim, and a hostile work environment claim. On January 3, 2006, both parties filed memoranda in support of motions for summary judgment on the hostile work environment claim (Doc. 67, 69). After reviewing the motions and hearing oral argument, the Court DENIES both motions for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yonemoto v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- D'Franco v. Fountainebleau Florida Hotel, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
- Kirby v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Reichert v. HornbeckDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Reichert v. HornbeckDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.