Legal Opinion

In Re Corrinet

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2011No. 10-35568Published

1Opinion of the Court

645 F.3d 1141 (2011)

In re Mark Steven CORRINET, Mark Steven Corrinet, Appellant.

No. 10-35568.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 3, 2011.

Filed July 19, 2011.

Mark S. Corrinet, Waldport, OR, appearing pro se.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, A. WALLACE TASHIMA and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge A. WALLACE TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.

OPINION

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

We are called upon to review the revocation of an attorney's membership in the District of Oregon bar on the ground that he is not a member of the Oregon State Bar.

I

Mark…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API