Legal Opinion

Blakeley v. Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 1958No. 37266PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by Charles Blakeley, doing business as McLoud Telephone Company, from an order of the Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma requiring McLoud Telephone Company and the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (of Oklahoma City) to furnish Foreign Exchange Telephone Service to Frank Men-donca who owns and operates a large dairy in the McLoud Telephone Company area. For convenience the parties will be referred to as the “McLoud Exchange”, “Bell”, and “Mendonca.”

The McLoud Exchange is located in Mc-Loud, Oklahoma, twenty-five miles east of Oklahoma City. All long distance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TindallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Moore v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Alabama Public Service Commission v. CrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Oklahoma Transportation Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Data Transmission Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Teleco, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Application of Southwestern Bell Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Answering, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Corporation Commission v. Radiocall Paging ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API