Legal Opinion
Luria Steel & Trading Corp. v. Ford
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided November 17, 1949No. Civ. No. 106-49PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOHOE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Luria Steel & Trading Corporation, has presented its motion for a partial summary judgment and for an order of direction as to further proceedings pursuant to Rule 56(a) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The matter was argued and briefs were submitted to the court. After due consideration, the court is of the opinion that the motion must be overruled.
The pleadings show a complaint containing two causes of action; one on a promissory note and one on an account stated. The defendants filed an answer denying indebtedness to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Parmelee v. Chicago Eye Shield Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- American Ins. Co. v. Gentile Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- George A. Lies v. Farrell Lines, Inc. And Does One Through Ten, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Ford v. Luria Steel & Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- In Re the Complaint of Norfolk, Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. SloanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re Georgia Jewelers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.