Legal Opinion
Heidi Ott A.G. v. Target Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 8, 2001No. CIV 99-1170 (PAMJGL)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants in part and denies in part each Defendant’s Motion and denies Plaintiffs’ Motion.
BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff Heidi Ott (“Ott”), 2 a Swiss citizen, has designed and manufactured artisan dolls for many years. On November 2, 1982, Ott registered her mark, Heidi Ott®, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Reg. No. 1,215,011). Ott’s handmade dolls range in price from $100…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Trilink Saw Chain, LLC v. Blount, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Issaenko v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- 3M Innovative Properties Co. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.