Legal Opinion

McMahan v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 2005No. A106299, A106423PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

San Francisco voters adopted Proposition N, an initiative ordinance popularly known as “Care Not Cash,” to address the city’s persistent homeless problem. The measure required that San Francisco provide in-kind benefits such as permanent housing and meals to eligible indigents, replacing the majority of an individual’s existing cash grant with those guaranteed services. The measure also mandated a baseline appropriation to fund the in-kind services.

But after the voters approved the initiative, San Francisco announced that the funding provisions of the law were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Santa Barbara School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brosterhous v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. PreslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Benito Acosta v. City of Costa MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Vivid Entertainment v. Jonathan FieldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. LAZARIN v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API