Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

These cases were heard together and upon the same testimony. They are actions of assumpsit for the use of an engine and expenses of its operation, the *649road being under Federal control during part of the period involved. A jury was waived and all questions of law and fact were submitted to the judge of the trial court, so that where the evidence conflicts upon any material point, the judgment of the trial court on the facts will be given the same weight as if it were the verdict of a jury. F. W. Stock & Sons v. Owen, 129 Va. 261, 105 S. E. 587.

Ignoring the conflicts in the testimony which have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clough v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. F. W. Stock & Sons v. Owen & BarkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Seward v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Norfolk Tidewater Terminals, Inc. v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API