Legal Opinion

F. W. Stock & Sons v. Owen & Barker

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 20, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Norfolk in a proceeding by motion for a judgment for damages. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

F. W. Stock & Sons is a corporation engaged in the milling business at Hillsdale, Michigan, and manufactures and sells large quantities of mill feed. In furtherance of its business it maintained an office at Norfolk, Virginia, which was conducted in the corporate name of F. W. Stock & Sons, and was in charge of Harold Stock. Owen & Barker were commission merchants of the city of Lynchburg, Virginia. Prior to the present controversy they had bought mill feed of F. W. Stock & Sons, and their method of doing business was to ask quotations of F. W. Stock & Sons, Norfolk, Virginia, and upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bronson's v. ChappellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. J. C. Lysle Milling Co. v. S. W. Holt & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  3. Hoster-Columbus Associated Breweries Co. v. Stag Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reece Corp. v. Ariela, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
  2. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. FerrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  4. Eastern Shore of Virginia Produce Exchange v. BeloteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Norris v. BrownRichmond County Circuit Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API