TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Arterburn, J.
I dissent from the majority opinion because I do not think that the equity and civil side of a court should assume to take over and control the criminal side, nor the discretion of the executive and law enforcement branch of our government. This is an action brought against the prosecuting attorney, the sheriff, chief of police, and others constituting the law enforcement arm of the executive branch of our government. The main objective of the action, it will have to be admitted, is to enjoin officials of this branch of the government from exercising their…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Dept. of Financial Institutions v. HOLT, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Fry v. Superior Court of Lake CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Spencer v. Criminal Court, Marion Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of CrothersvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.