Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Crothersville

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1902No. 19,746PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From Jackson Circuit Court; T. B. Buskirk, Judge. Suit by the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Eailroad Company against town of Crothersville and others to enjoin the abatement of an alleged nuisance. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— It appears from the record that appellees, the town of Crothersville, its board of health and marshal, were taking steps and threatening to remove appellant’s stock-pens in said town, on the ground that they were a public nuisance, and that this suit/was brought to enjoin them from doing so. The complaint was in three paragraphs, the second and third of which were held by the court insufficient on demurrer for want of facts. Appellees filed a general denial to the first paragraph. The court heard the case, made a special finding of the facts, stated conclusions of law thereon in favor of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Susquehanna Fertilizer Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. City of Valparaiso v. MoffittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Robinson v. BaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Comminge & Geisler v. StevensonTexas Supreme Court · 1890

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Noble v. DavisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Albright v. KarstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. Muncie Electric Light Co. v. JoliffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API