Ramsey v. Flournoy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment in the Twenty-first District Court, Modoc County. Clough, J. The plaintiff and certain defendants demurred to the answer of the defendant Dorris. The demurrer was sustained, and the defendant Dorris appealed from the judgment entered thereon.
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
This is a case of conflicting claims to a certain tract of swamp and overflowed land, referred by the Surveyor-General of this State to one of the late District Courts for a final *261determination. Appellant, Dorris, one of the defendants, filed an answer, which was demurred to, on the ground “that it appears upon the face of said defendant’s answer that he is not entitled to purchase any portion of the land claimed by the plaintiff herein.” The demurrer was sustained and judgment by default entered against appellant, from which he has appealed.
The demurrer was, doubtless, to the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Moran v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Anthony v. JillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Dillon v. LegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Coons v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.