Legal Opinion

Donrick Sanderson v. Whoop, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 9, 2026No. 3:23-cv-05477Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DONRICK SANDERSON, Case No. 23-cv-05477-CRB 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART CROSS- MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 10 WHOOP, INC., JUDGMENT 11 Defendant. Docket Nos. 97, 99 12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 This is a certified class action arising from alleged violations of California state 14 consumer protection laws. Plaintiff Donrick Sanderson alleges that Whoop, Inc. 15 (“Whoop”) violated California’s Automatic Renewal Law (“ARL”) and, through said 16 violations, deceived consumers and illegally charged them…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API