Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 10, 2011No. 63213-2-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, C.J.

¶1 — Where the jury finds that a defendant committed a crime under aggravating circumstances, this *304factual finding authorizes the trial court to exercise its discretion in imposing any sentence between the statutorily-authorized minimum sentence and the statutorily-authorized maximum sentence. Here, the jury made such a determination. Thus, Taliferro Williams’s constitutional rights were not violated by the imposition of an exceptional sentence that did not exceed the statutory maximum. Moreover, Williams’s additional claims of error are unavailing. Accordingly, we affirm.

I

¶2 On September 13,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. KING CTY. DEPT. OF ADULT DETEN. v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. King County Department of Adult & Juvenile Detention v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. ChamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API