Legal Opinion

State v. Schmitt

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 3, 2012No. Nos. 2011AP1949, 2011AP2692PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. In this case we decide that, even though the summons, complaint and the supporting affidavit must each be authenticated as a condition of personal jurisdiction when commencing a forfeiture action, the failure to authenticate the affidavit in this instance was a technical and not a fundamental error where the deficiency was due to a clerk's error. Our supreme court has held that when the failure to authenticate is due to a clerk's error, the error is technical. We affirm the circuit court's judgment and order.

¶ 2. Few facts are relevant to this appeal. Robert M. Schmitt appeals from a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cohn v. Town of RandallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. State v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Mahoney v. Menard Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anthony Gagliano & Co. v. Openfirst, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  2. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API