Legal Opinion

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Manasco

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1998No. 97-1005PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbbott, Justice

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HECHT, ENOCH, OWEN, BAKER and HANKINSON, Justices, join.

The issue in this case is whether a workers’ compensation claimant who failed to appeal his original impairment rating can reopen the issue months later by arguing, under Texas Labor Code section 410.307, that a “substantial change of condition” has occurred. The trial court granted summary judgment for the workers’ compensation insurance carrier, concluding that the issue could not be reopened. The court of appeals reversed. Manasco v. Lumbermens Mutual Cas. Co., 951 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. App. — Beaumont…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Manasco v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Albertson's, Inc. v. SinclairTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Continental Casualty Insurance Co. v. Functional Restoration AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rodriguez v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fulton v. Associated Indemnity Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  5. Harris County Emergency Services District 1 v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API