Fulton v. Associated Indemnity Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
Donald Fulton suffered a back injury while on the job and after several months of treatment was assessed at maximum medical improvement (MMI) with an impairment rating of seven percent. Six months later his symptoms resurfaced, and Fulton and his doctors asked the Workers’ Compensation Commission to amend his MMI certification date and impairment rating. The Commission determined that Fulton’s first MMI assessment and impairment rating had become final because he failed to dispute that rating within ninety days of its assignment, as required by Commission Rule 130.5(e)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Albertson's, Inc. v. SinclairTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Rodriguez v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Kroger Co. v. KengTexas Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Patient Advocates v. Texas Workers Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- State Office of Risk Management v. Elaine E. Banks Joiner, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
- Texas Builders Insurance Co. v. Molder, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
- Severiano DeLeon v. Royal Indemnity Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.