Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1994No. 93CA1175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

In this action to recover for injuries resulting from a slip and fall, defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears), appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Dorothy Pennington. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Pennington alleged in her complaint that, after a large snowfall, she slipped and fell in a puddle of water inside Sears’ store. She asserted Sears was negligent and requested recovery for medical expenses, permanent bodily injury, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of earning capacity.

Sears’ answer denied negligence and raised, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. People v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Brown Ex Rel. Webb v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. CustinIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Flieg v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Genova v. LONGS PEAK EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Bonser v. ShainholtzColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Genova v. Longs Peak Emergency PhysiciansColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Bonser v. ShainholtzColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Pennington v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API