Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1994No. 93CA1175Published

1Opinion of the Court

878 P.2d 152 (1994)

Dorothy PENNINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93CA1175.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V.

June 30, 1994.

Irwin & Boesen, P.C., Brad R. Irwin, Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Anstine and Hill, Ronald C. Hill, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

Opinion by Judge CASEBOLT.

In this action to recover for injuries resulting from a slip and fall, defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears), appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Dorothy Pennington. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Pennington alleged in her complaint that,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. People v. District Court in & for First Judicial District, Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Prutch v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Brown Ex Rel. Webb v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API