Poelcher v. Poelcher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
This is an appeal from an order refusing to open a judgment entered by confession upon a warrant of attorney.
The appellant’s burden is a heavy one. An application to open a confessed judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the court which, in the exercise thereof, is governed by equitable principles; and, on appeal, the court’s dispositive order will not be reversed except for a clear abuse of discretion: see Berkowitz v. Kass, 351 Pa. 263, 264, 40 A. 2d 691, and cases there cited. A refusal to open a judgment where the defendant has produced evidence,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Berkowitz v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Anderson v. BestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Meek v. FrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Cosgrove v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Roche v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. WilmingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Poelcher v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Philadelphia Gas Heating Co. v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.