Legal Opinion

Poelcher v. Poelcher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1950No. Appeal, 23PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This is an appeal from an order refusing to open a judgment entered by confession upon a warrant of attorney.

The appellant’s burden is a heavy one. An application to open a confessed judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the court which, in the exercise thereof, is governed by equitable principles; and, on appeal, the court’s dispositive order will not be reversed except for a clear abuse of discretion: see Berkowitz v. Kass, 351 Pa. 263, 264, 40 A. 2d 691, and cases there cited. A refusal to open a judgment where the defendant has produced evidence,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Berkowitz v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Anderson v. BestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Meek v. FrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Cosgrove v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Roche v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. WilmingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Poelcher v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Philadelphia Gas Heating Co. v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API