Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles A. Hunter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1972No. 72-2427PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from conviction of mail theft. The question presented is whether the mail, which was the subject of the theft, should have been suppressed as the product of an unlawful search and seizure.

Appellant was a passenger in a car, stopped for making an illegal change of lane. Under these circumstances an investigative stop was perfectly proper. See United States v. Smith, 441 F.2d 539 (9th Cir. 1971).

Appellant and the driver were told to get out of the car and were then subjected to a pat-down search. Appellant makes much of the contended illegality of this procedure, but it produced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramona Cipres and Juan Montes Deoca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Robert Bustamonte v. Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Freddie McKinley SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. United States v. Harry Sherman LuckettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Javier Contreras-Diaz, United States of America v. Bernadette Marie MontesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Crawford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Harper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API