Legal Opinion

Ramona Cipres and Juan Montes Deoca v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1965No. 19217_1PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

Ramona Ciprés and Juan Montes De-Oca appeal from convictions for trafficking in marihuana contrary to 21 U.S. C.A. § 176a.

I

Appellants argue that the district court erred in admitting into evidence two suitcases containing marihuana, contending that the evidence was secured by conduct violating Ciprés’ Fourth Amendment right to freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.

The marihuana was discovered and seized at the Los Angeles International Airport by a Customs agent and an offi cer of the Los Angeles Police Department. Their testimony relevant to the search and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Santos Montoya, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. James F. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Ben Herbert Phelper v. Bill Decker, Sheriff of Dallas County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API