Legal Opinion

Rubenstein & Rubenstein v. Papadakos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered May 1,1968, denying motion to dismiss first affirmative defense and first counterclaim in amended answer, unanimously reversed on the law and motion granted with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants. The original answer contained a first defense and counterclaim pleaded together. On motion this was dismissed with leave to replead. It appears from the court’s opinion that the matter pleaded constituted neither a defense nor a counterclaim. Defendant served an amended answer pursuant to leave granted. In this amended answer there is, inter alia, a first defense, a second…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Whiteaker v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  3. Masterson v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Zee Co. v. Williams, Mullen, Clark & Dobbins, P.C.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API