Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Haines

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1989No. 93 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

520 Pa. 484 (1989)

555 A.2d 58

Frank L. RIZZO and Lena Rizzo, Appellees,

v.

Barton A. HAINES, Esq., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 13, 1988.

Decided March 6, 1989.

James D. Crawford, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Herbert Braker, Louis Kattelman, Philadelphia, for appellees.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

STOUT, Justice.

Barton A. Haines, Esquire, appeals from the order of the Superior Court, 357 Pa.Super. 57, 515 A.2d 321 affirming in part, and reversing and remanding in part, the judgment order of the Court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King, J. v. Driscoll, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API