Legal Opinion

J.T. v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 1, 2016No. 12-618VPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l-34.; Motion for review; Jurisdiction over interim decision.

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10-34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act”). Currently before the court is petitioner’s motion for review of the special master’s September 17, 2015 interim ruling in favor of respondent that petitioner’s lost earnings should not include potential future business endeavors. The decision did not make an award of compensation. The motion is fully briefed. Oral argument is unnecessary.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Vessels v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Weiss v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Lemire v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Spratling v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  2. Bravo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. Bravo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Dillenbeck v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  5. Gaiter v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API