Legal Opinion

Bravo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 16, 2020No. 17-501Published

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-501V (Filed Under Seal: June 30, 2020 | Reissued: July 16, 2020) * ) BERLIN V. BRAVO, ) Keywords: Motion for Review; Decision ) on Compensation; Vaccine Act; Vaccine Petitioner, ) Rule 10(a); Subject-Matter Jurisdiction. ) v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER 1 On April 10, 2017, Petitioner,2 Berlin Bravo, filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the “Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§300aa-1 to -34, as amended. ECF No. 1. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Shaw v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Weiss v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Lemire v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API