Legal Opinion

Rolinson v. Rolinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1955No. Civ. 20611PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

The principal question on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that Mary A. Rolinson did not receive title to certain corporate stock by gift of her husband, George H. Rolinson, since deceased. Mrs. Rolinson brought suit against the defendant, Myron A. Rolinson, executor of the estate of the deceased, to quiet title to certain specifically described shares of stock. She alleged that the decedent made a gift of the stocks to her during his lifetime and that she is now owner of them and entitled to their possession. Defendant denied those claims and filed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hart v. KetchumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Beebe v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Odenthal v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Burke v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cicinelli v. IwasakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Bazaure v. RichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Benom v. BenomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. In re F. P. Newport Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1961
  5. Lawson v. LowengartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API