Doyle v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a bench trial, Robert Doyle was convicted of both driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent he was a less safe driver1 and per se driving under the influence of alcohol.2 He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred (i) in denying his motion to suppress the results of field sobriety tests and (ii) in admitting the results of the state-administered chemical test without first proving his consent. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. *593(Punctuation omitted.) Turner v. State.3 Furthermore, “since the trial court sits as the trier of fact,…