Legal Opinion
Eiland v. Hardesty
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 16, 1982No. 80 C 1293PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Woodrow Eiland, a black American, has brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985(2) and (3) (1976), alleging that defendants Richard Hardesty, a Chicago Police Officer, Officers Lunt, Betts, and Montgomery, the City of Chicago, Richard Brzec-zek, Superintendent of Police, and Frank Nolan, Director of the Office of Professional Standards deprived him of liberty and his right to be free from summary punishment without due process of law, in violation of the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hampton v. HanrahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Jones v. Sabis Educational Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Bertoncini v. SchrimpfDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Regalado v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Auriemma v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.