Legal Opinion

Lee v. West Kern Water District

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2016No. F070772PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, J.

This case involves the applicability of the workers’ compensation exclusivity rule to an unusual set of facts. This rule governs the matter of when an injured worker can bring a civil action against the employer and when he or she is instead limited to the remedy of a workers’ compensation award.

Plaintiff Kathy Lee, an employee of defendant West Kern Water District (district), sued the district and four coemployees for assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress after the coemployees staged a mock robbery with Lee as the victim. In the mock robbery, one of the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Alzayat v. Hebb, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. 132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical TherapyNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Frausto v. Dept. of the Cal. Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Garcia v. Praxair Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API