Legal Opinion
Third Nat. Bank v. Harrison
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
Decided February 13, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Motion for a New Trial. These causes being of a like nature were, by order of court, tried together.
1Opinion of the Court
Teeat, D. J.
These causes of action were based on promissory notes executed by Harrison, to the order of Alexander, payable at the Third National Bank. Alexander indorsed and delivered said notes to said bank as collateral to secure a demand note by him to the bank. The indorsement and delivery of said Harrison notes were contemporaneous with the execution, delivery, and discount of the Alexander note under the following agreement:
“$5,000.
St. Louis, Missouri, October 4,1878.
“ On demand, after date, I promise to pay to the order of Third national Bank of St. Louis $5,000, for value received;…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lloyd v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Vallett v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- McClure v. Township of OxfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Thompson v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Gregory v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- David Dows, Jr. & Co. v. GlaspelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Comerford v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- State Savings Bank v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.