Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. O'Malley v. Illinois Commerce Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 6, 1993No. 2-91-1421, 2-91-1459, 2-92-0007, 2-92-0014, 2-92-0032, 2-92-0059, 2-92-0060, 2-92-0061 consPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman
The parties come before us for the second time in this matter of administrative review of a filing by respondent, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (Bell or Company), with the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission). The filing sought new and restructured telephone rates. The petitioners, who were intervenors in the proceedings before the Commission, consist of consumers and Bell’s competitors. They seek review of an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission issued on remand. The consumer intervenors are: the People of Cook County ex rel. Jack O’Malley; the People of the State of Illinois ex…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Ranquist v. StacklerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Ill. Bell Telephone v. Ill. Comm. Com'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Ameropan Oil Corp. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.