Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 1996No. Nos. 2—94—1272, 2—94—1440, 2—94—1443, 2—94—1464, 2—94—1468 consPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchinson

The present case is a direct appeal from an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission). See 220 ILCS 5/10—201 (West 1994). Illinois Bell Telephone Company (Bell) initiated this proceeding by filing a petition in Commission docket No. 92—0448 to regulate rates and charges for noncompetitive services under an alternative form of regulation (petition). See 220 ILCS 5/13—506.1 (West 1994). The Citizens Utility Board (CUB) then filed a complaint in Commission docket No. 93—0239 for an investigation and reduction of Bell’s rates (complaint). See 220 ILCS 5/9—250, 10—108 (West 1994).…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Illinois Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n v. BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lagen v. Balcor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Crocker v. FinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ill. Bell Telephone v. Ill. Comm. Com'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Ameren Illinois Company v. The Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Commerce Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API