Legal Opinion
Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 1, 1997No. 1—95—0153, 1—95—0155, 1—95—0156, 1—95—0659 consPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HARTMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
On February 10, 1994, Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) revised tariff schedules, proposing an increase in annual revenues "by about 7.9%.” Edison also filed exhibits and testimony in support of the rate increase. The Commission thereafter twice suspended, until January 9, 1995, Edison’s filed tariffs.
During these proceedings, appearances or petitions to intervene were filed by the staff of the Commission (Staff), the State of Illinois by the Attorney General (AG), the City…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- United Cities Gas Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Chicago v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Peoples Gas, Light & Coke Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- People ex rel. Madigan v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- People v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.