Legal Opinion

Concerned Citizens v. Town of Coupeville

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 19, 1991No. 26659-4-IPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.

Landmark Plaza, Inc., appeals the trial court's entry of partial summary judgment in favor of respondent Concerned Coupeville Citizens, in which the court vacated the Coupeville Town Council's grant of a conditional use permit to Landmark. We reverse.

Facts

Appellant Landmark Plaza, Inc. (Landmark) sought to construct a commercial mini-storage on property it owned in Coupeville, Washington. Because the intended use was classified, as a "conditional use" by Coupeville Town Ordinance 381E, a conditional use permit was required. On April 3, 1989, Landmark filed an application for a conditional use…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lauterbach v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Donald v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Re v. TenneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Buchsieb/Danard, Inc. v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Christian v. PurdyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Sherman v. KissingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API