Larose v. Superintendent
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The petitioners, Jay Larose, Shawna Brown, and Richard Theriault, appeal the Superior Court’s (Dalianis, J.) denial of their consolidated petitions for writ of habeas corpus, challenging the legality of their arraignments and bail hearings conducted by video teleconference because they could not make bail. We affirm.
Pursuant to a temporary order of this court, arraignments and bail hearings in Hillsborough County may be conducted via a teleconference system installed between the superior courthouse, housing in this instance the Nashua District Court, and the Nashua Police Station. Under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- David Valenzuela-Gonzalez v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Leroy BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In re BagleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. LindseyIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- In re Baby K.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- People v. LindseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.