Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Daniel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 5, 1973No. 19689Published

1Opinion of the Court

261 S.C. 198 (1973)

199 S.E.2d 74

Moseley C. COLEMAN, Appellant,

v.

James D. DANIEL, II, et al., Respondents.

19689

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

September 5, 1973.

William E. Jenkinson, Esq., of Kingstree, for Appellant.

Messrs. Connor and Connor, of Kingstree, for Respondent.

September 5, 1973.

LITTLEJOHN, Justice:

The plaintiff, Moseley C. Coleman, is the owner of two deficiency judgments procured May 30, 1966, against the defendant Linzie L. Rogers, and against his son, L.M. Rogers, known as Buddy Rogers. Coleman brings this action as a creditor of defendant Linzie Rogers, under South Carolina…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gardner v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  2. Coleman v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Daniels v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Jeffords v. BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  5. Farmers Bank v. BradhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API