Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Rowell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1977No. KCD 28336PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted in the Municipal Court of Kansas City, Missouri, for an ordinance violation of solicitation of an immoral act. Defendant appealed to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, and the matter was heard by the trial court sitting without a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence, the defendant who had appeared pro se had requested an opportunity to make a statement to which the trial court responded:

“The court finds the defendant guilty and sentences the defendant to sixty days.”

Immediately thereafter, the court made a finding of guilt and assessed the punishment at sixty days…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. City of Clayton v. NemoursMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Kansas City v. StricklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Mexico v. MerlineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Estill v. IannoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. City of Richmond Heights v. BuehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. St. Louis County v. RothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API