Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 13, 1964No. 50406PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STORCKMAN, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment overruling a motion under S.Ct. Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. to vacate a conviction of forcible rape. In accordance with the habitual criminal act, the court assessed the punishment and fixed it at imprisonment for 99 years. The contentions raised are that the sentence and judgment were entered immediately after the verdict was returned thereby preventing the defendant from filing a valid motion for new trial and precluding him from preserving assignments of errors for review on appeal in violation of his rights under the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. State v. TurpinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Chiles v. FuchsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. State v. WithersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. State v. SchierhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. King v. SwensonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. State v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. State v. TandySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. State v. JaegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API