Legal Opinion

Pulliam v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 1, 2019No. 1080/18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pulliam v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., No. 1080, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Nazarian, J. REAL PROPERTY – FORECLOSURE – DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT Deficiency judgments under Maryland Rule 14-216(b) allow secured parties or parties in interest to obtain an in personam judgment if there is a deficiency after the completion of an in rem mortgage foreclosure proceeding. Deficiency judgments are initiated by a motion filed after the primary foreclosure case has concluded, and after ratification of the audit, the fact and amount of the deficiency are adjudicated and not subject to re-litigation. Circuit Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Ehrlich v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newsom v. Brock & Scott, PLLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Huertas v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Newsom v. Brock & Scott, PLLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Richards v. NewRez, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API