Legal Opinion
Shuster v. Doane (In re Shuster)
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 6, 1984No. Bankruptcy No. 3-83-1457; Adv. No. 83-0443PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOHN J. CONNELLY, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the Debtors’ complaint seeking to avoid the security interest or lien of the Doanes created by the Debtors’ assignment of their vendor’s interest in a contract for deed. The parties agreed that no factual issues existed, and submitted the matter on cross motions for summary judgment.
Now, based on the file and arguments of counsel the Court makes the following memorandum order pursuant to the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
I
In 1978 the Debtors sold some real property to the Thomsens pursuant to a contract…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Petition of S. R. A., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Summers v. Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Blee v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Nichols v. L & O, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. RandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shuster v. Doane (In Re Shuster)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- In Re Martin Frank Shuster and Carol Sue Shuster, Debtors. Martin Frank Shuster and Carol Sue Shuster v. Richard Doane and Barbara Doane and Production Credit Association of Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin v. Forest Lake State Bank and Mary Jo Thomsen and Donald ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Shuster v. DoaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986