Shuster v. Doane (In Re Shuster)
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RENNER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Martin and Carol Shuster (“the debtors”) appeal the bankruptcy court’s adverse summary judgment ruling. 38 B.R. 619. The appeal was considered without oral argument. For reversal, the debtors argue that the bankruptcy court erred in finding that the appellees had perfected their security interest in an assignment of a vendor’s interest in a contract for deed. The Court agrees.
FACTS
In 1978, the debtors sold real estate located in Washington County, Minnesota to Mary Jo and Donald Thomsen on a contract for deed. The contract for deed was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Petition of S. R. A., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Freeborn v. Seattle Trust & Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Castle Rock Industrial Bank v. S.O.A.W. Enterprises, Inc. (In Re S.O.A.W. Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1983
- In Re Staff Mortgage & Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Landmark Land Co., Inc. v. SpragueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Security Bank v. ChiapuzioOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Northern Acres, Inc. v. Hillman State Bank (In Re Northern Acres, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- In Re WallaceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1986
- In Re Martin Frank Shuster and Carol Sue Shuster, Debtors. Martin Frank Shuster and Carol Sue Shuster v. Richard Doane and Barbara Doane and Production Credit Association of Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin v. Forest Lake State Bank and Mary Jo Thomsen and Donald ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Vincent Gaines Implement Co. v. United States (In Re Vincent Gaines Implement Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.