Legal Opinion

In Re Santillanes

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1943No. 4760Published

1Opinion

This is an original habeas corpus proceeding brought under the provisions of Article VI, Sec. 3, New Mexico Constitution, and Rule 24, Supreme Court Rules. The writ was first applied for and hearing had upon the several questions here presented before the Honorable A.W. Marshall, District Judge of the Sixth Judicial District. Petitioner was there denied the relief sought and the act was held constitutional. Petitioner then filed this original proceeding here. This he may do. Ex parte Nabors, 33 N.M. 324,267 P. 58. And here, as in the Nabors case, we are not called upon to say, and do not…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API