Legal Opinion

Heinold v. Siecke

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1999No. S-98-210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court for Stanton County determining that a life tenant’s share of certain annual crops which were planted before his death but harvested thereafter were assets of his estate and were not payable to the remainderman. We affirm.

FACTS

Prior to January 11, 1988, Adolph W. Heinold and his wife, Laura M. Heinold, were the owners in fee of a tract of real estate located in Stanton County, Nebraska. On that date the Heinolds made, executed, and delivered to LaVeme Heinold a warranty deed conveying the real estate in fee, reserving for themselves “the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Putnam v. FortenberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Powell v. American Charter Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Beacom v. DaleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re Estate of LukeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INS. v. YelichNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Trust of RosenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Johnson v. ClarkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Estate of RossoNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Miller v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Dunn v. DaubNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API